Because Anonymous did everything
Someone linked me some news article on wired.com (Hackers Assault Epilepsy Patients via Computer). The article itself is quite shocking, this has nothing to do with hacking but all with the most antisocial people you can imagine. But when you read this part:
Circumstantial evidence suggests the attack was the work of members of Anonymous, an informal collective of griefers best known for their recent war on the Church of Scientology. The first flurry of posts on the epilepsy forum referenced the site EBaumsWorld, which is much hated by Anonymous. And forum members claim they found a message board thread -- since deleted -- planning the attack at 7chan.org, a group stronghold.
The article just lost its credibility. I understand it is useful to have an organisation to blame for everything that goes wrong on the internet, but this goes too far. The so called "proof" is pure guessing, the thread has been suddenly deleted and it is claimed by some forum members. I just can't believe big sites like wired fall for this junk.
